I call for indictments and trials of all involved. The bottom line is not a measure of moral behaviour.
From the Detroit Free Press May 22, 2007
Secret test gave patients a substitute for blood
In Detroit, one of 9 died; U.S. agency is investigating
May 22, 2007
BY STEVE NEAVLING
FREE PRESS STAFF WRITER
You're in a car crash, unconscious and bleeding profusely.
Without your consent, you are injected with an experimental blood substitute being randomly tested on victims of car crashes, shootings and other trauma. That's exactly what happened to nine trauma patients -- one of whom died -- at two Detroit hospitals last year.
Nine other patients randomly selected to receive the standard treatment -- saline solution and real blood -- survived.
The blood substitute, Polyheme, was tested in 20 cities.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is investigating 46 deaths nationwide among the 349 subjects who received Polyheme in the clinical trial. By contrast, 35 of the 363 patients given the standard treatment died.
In most clinical studies, patients must volunteer, usually doing so with the hope of being cured through the experimental treatment.
But the Polyheme trial was one of 15 no-consent studies permitted by the FDA since 1996, when it began allowing researchers to enroll patients in clinical tests without their permission if the treatment showed enough potential to save lives.
Some medical ethicists are outraged at the Polyheme trial.
"This is completely unethical," said Dr. Sidney Wolfe, director of Public Citizen's Health Research Group. "They withheld blood -- the gold standard -- for a product that has proven in previous clinical circumstances to raise the death rate."
Inside the study
Northfield Laboratories of Evanston, Ill., Polyheme's manufacturer, contends there was no other way to test the product. Trauma patients are generally unconscious and cannot give consent.
"If I were injured, would I want Polyheme? Absolutely. I would prefer it," said Dr. Larry Diebel, who led the trials in Detroit and is a medical professor at Wayne State University. Detroit Receiving and Sinai Grace hospitals participated in the testing.Northfield maintains that there were violations of study protocols with nearly one-fifth of the participants. In some cases, it said, paramedics gave Polyheme to people who were going to die regardless of treatment.
The company plans to release a report as early as this month from a research organization it contracted with to review the data. In December, Northfield's data showed that if 122 questionable cases were excluded, the increase in the mortality rate for those who received Polyheme over those who received blood was just 18.7%. Without those cases being excluded, the rate was 49%.
To fill a critical need
Another no-consent study involving Hemopure, a similar blood substitute manufactured by Biopure of Cambridge, Mass., was halted in December by the FDA.. The agency raised concerns that the Navy personnel on whom the product was being tested were dying and suffering heart attacks.
The FDA declined to comment on the Polyheme study while it is reviewing it.
Advocates say Polyheme, which is made by extracting oxygen-carrying hemoglobin from human red blood cells, comes along at a time when the United States is facing a critical blood shortage.
Nationally, about 100,000 people die of bleeding injuries every year. Medical professionals say some deaths could be prevented if not for blood shortages.
The shortage of O-negative blood, the universal-donor blood type that can be administered to any patient, is especially acute. At southeastern Michigan hospitals, the demand for O-negative is so high that none is stockpiled, said Martha Kurz, spokeswoman for the American Red Cross of Southeastern Michigan.
A blood substitute such as Polyheme could be especially useful in combat because the product has a long shelf life and doesn't need to be refrigerated, researchers say.
Hemorrhaging remains a main cause of death on the battlefield, and the U.S. Army reports about 60% of those injured in Iraq suffered substantial blood loss.
Earlier problems
Northfield Laboratories was criticized in 2001 for a four-year Polyheme study on aneurysm-surgery patients.
Ten of 81 patients who were given the substitute suffered heart attacks, including two who died. None of the 71 patients on standard therapy had heart attacks.
The company blamed the heart attacks on an excess of total fluids given to Polyheme patients and halted the study.
The second trial was approved by the FDA, in part, because Northfield was testing Polyheme for a different purpose.
The Detroit Medical Center, which runs the two Detroit hospitals that participated in the second trial, said the lone fatality involved a man hit by an SUV. The DMC declined to comment further on the trial or give the names of the patients, citing privacy laws.
Diebel, the trials' leader in Detroit, said all of the Detroit hospitals' patients were victims of shootings or car crashes and were between the ages of 19 and 55.
He said he believes Polyheme is a breakthrough in emergency medicine. In addition to being compatible with all blood types and storing longer than blood, it is virtually free of viral transmission.
Northfield Laboratories saw its stock plummet 75% after the December disclosure of the death rate, prompting a class action by investors who claim they were never told about the number of heart attacks in the first study.
Contact STEVE NEAVLING at 586-469-4935 or sneavling@freepress.com.
Copyright © 2007 Detroit Free Press Inc.
if(typeof gcion_enable_bt != 'undefined') {
if(gcion_enable_bt) {
document.writeln('');
}
}
if(typeof gcion_enable_bt != 'undefined') {
if(gcion_enable_bt) {
var gciYear = 2007;
DM_addToLoc("zipcode", escape(s.prop30));
DM_addToLoc("age", escape((gciYear-s.prop31)));
DM_addToLoc("gender", escape(s.prop32));
DM_tag();
}
}
=0)document.write(unescape('%3C')+'\!-'+'-')
//-->
Initializing : 78ms
Starting first parse
Retrieve categories: 0ms
Read templates: 0ms
Read objects: 0ms
Scripts: 0ms
Read cache: 16ms
-->
Secret testing violates trust
May 23, 2007
The "yuck" factor already is pretty high with Polyheme, a radical blood substitute that conjures up images of cyborg medicine using synthetic fluids.
But add to that the fact that hospitals -- including two in this area -- used this
stuff in a trial on unsuspecting (and non-consenting) trauma victims, sometimes with fatal results, and the outrage factor runs high, too. Who ever thought this was a good idea?
The concept may well have merit. Blood donorship has its peaks and valleys, and in combat situations especially, a ready substitute could prove miraculous -- even though it sounds icky.
But secret tests on patients?
History is full of cautionary tales about the dangers therein, and the mistrust these kinds of experiments almost always engender. It's tough enough to trust doctors and the medical establishment, difficult still for many people to have faith that their lives are in the best hands.
Clandestine trials of something so vital as artificial blood can only exacerbate the discomfort.
It doesn't help at all that Polyheme, in addition to providing a substitute for red blood cells, also appears to agitate blood vessels, sometimes causing heart attacks. Those heart problems caused 46 deaths nationwide, and one locally.
The Food and Drug Administration has pretty strict rules for no-consent trials, and at least in theory, Polyheme would qualify. But that still doesn't make it a smart way to try such an invasive and, apparently, risky product.
The fallout from Polyheme's troubles should inspire the FDA to rethink how medical innovation is pursued.
Copyright © 2007 Detroit Free Press Inc.
if(typeof gcion_enable_bt != 'undefined') {
if(gcion_enable_bt) {
document.writeln('');
}
}
if(typeof gcion_enable_bt != 'undefined') {
if(gcion_enable_bt) {
var gciYear = 2007;
DM_addToLoc("zipcode", escape(s.prop30));
DM_addToLoc("age", escape((gciYear-s.prop31)));
DM_addToLoc("gender", escape(s.prop32));
DM_tag();
}
}
=0)document.write(unescape('%3C')+'\!-'+'-')
//-->
Initializing : 296ms
Starting first parse
.Build 3: 1138 ms (Article)
.Parsing macro sitecatalyst
..Build 3: 234 ms (Article)
.Completed macro sitecatalyst
.Build 9: 265 ms (Content)
Retrieve categories: 16ms
Read templates: 63ms
Read objects: 310ms
Scripts: 720ms
Starting second parse
Retrieve categories: 0ms
Read templates: 0ms
Read objects: 0ms
Scripts: 0ms
-->
Friday, May 25, 2007
A journal of interpretation and truth about our present world. Commentary on Current Events by a Teacher of History and American Government, Member of the DNC since 1952 and of MOVE ON.
About Me
- Name: Truthsayer
- Location: United States
Born in Vienna, Austria, lived in Hitzing. Fled to Italy in August 1938, then Columbia and then the USA. Saginaw Arthur Hill 1947, U of M 1957. US Air Force 1947-1952.American Mission for Aid to Greece. Charter Member Interlochen Arts Academy. Led MESC conversion traing Z(Paper to ADP)
Previous Posts
- Today we see the terrible consequences of pro busi...
- April 23.2007. Massacre on the campus of Virginia ...
- Today is Easter Sunday, which comememorates the Re...
- The Detroit Free Press has an article in today's D...
- jULY 28, 2006: A COMMENTARY: SCREAMING: EVERYTHIN...
- truthsayer: July 2006
- The President has vetod the Stem Cell Research Bil...
- jULY 20. The Moslem World has accellerated their a...
- Recently as only in the last several days I heard ...

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home